are living in a big metropolis? here come congestion expenses.

NYC site visitors (AP photo/Mary Altaffer)

You could see this one coming down the Pike.

Environmentalists who yearn to show us into Sweden were pushing the theory of a “congestion payment” for years, and now it finally may additionally become a reality for already beleaguered Boston motorists.

A “green ribbon” commission, a euphemism for rich do-gooders who understand what’s ideal for us, is recommending Boston slap a 5 buck payment on vehicles heading into or leaving probably the most congested ingredients of the city, akin to downtown, the returned Bay, the Longwood medical enviornment and the Seaport District.

If that’s now not bad satisfactory, they’d also like to impose a five buck parking “fee” on cars that aren’t heading domestic, an delivered indignity to commuters already being pressured to pay $350 a month to park in soiled, overpriced plenty.

These aren’t new ideas however are unwelcome ones, principally for commuters who are forced to power into Boston every day to work at low- or middle-revenue jobs that don’t pay them enough. Or visitors to the metropolis, probably right here to peer a ailing relative at probably the most hospitals in Longwood.

Many americans without problems can’t take the T, as a result of they can’t find the money for to live in Boston, and don’t reside near a instruct or a bus. Or they even have to get to their jobs on time, and simply can’t rely on the MBTA’s regularly delayed gadget.

Now they’ll be punished for coming into the metropolis, compelled to squander hundreds of additional dollars a month into simply their trip.

Environmentalists say the congestion payment will truly be first rate for commuters, because it will take automobiles off the road and diminish the period of time people should take a seat in gridlocked traffic.

but even proponents of the idea admit it’s a regressive tax, one so as to hit reduce-revenue people equally as complicated if now not tougher than wealthy americans.

Proponents of the plan also element to places like Stockholm, Sweden, where congestion costs have reduce down on the number of cars.

however Stockholm also happens to have a pretty good public transit equipment, not like Boston.

truly, the T is basically the deadly flaw of the congestion pricing idea. it would be one component if Boston had a clean official transit system. Then asking people to retain their automobiles at home could be a bit extra palatable.

one more aspect backers of the congestion fee want to flaunt is the a whole lot of hundreds of thousands in introduced revenue it'll generate.

but what that doesn’t have in mind is the entire misplaced income the metropolis will see in parking tickets that aren’t getting passed out, as a result of fewer people should be riding in to Boston to store.

And politically, the idea is a loser, which is why Mayor Marty Walsh says he’s no longer proposing the theory “at this time.”

This may be a type of times it’s fortunate Walsh has ambitions for higher office, as a result of a “congestion fee” doesn’t sound like an excellent plank for a statewide platform.


(c)2019 the Boston Herald

discuss with the Boston Herald at

dispensed by using Tribune content agency, LLC.


This content material is posted through a licensing contract with purchase Media the use of its NewsEdge technology.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]

score: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)